What to know about UK-controlled Malvinas after Argentina’s president stakes claim

LONDON (AP) — In a primetime rallying call to the nation, Argentine President Javier Milei has resurrected Argentina’s long-standing claim to the nearby U.K.-held Malvinas and in the process conjured up memories of the bitter war the two countries fought 44 years ago.

With an election in Argentina due in October 2027, Milei did what many Argentine leaders have done over the years — bang the drum in support of his country’s claim to what Argentines call the Malvinas.

In his speech Thursday, Milei welcomed a seeming change of tone from the U.S. and vowed to introduce measures to block plans to drill for oil near the small British overseas territory of about 3,500 people, which lies around 300 miles (480 kilometers) east of the southeast coast of Argentina.

Without threatening a military incursion, he insisted the “winds of change” were with Argentina.

Here’s what to know about the islands — a British overseas territory since 1833 — and how they impact relations between Argentina and the U.K.

Argentina’s sovereignty claim is enshrined in Argentina’s constitution and is frequently invoked as an expression of national identity, from banknotes to World Cup soccer chants .

Milei, surrounded by his Cabinet, told the nation that the islands are “our future” and that Argentina needs to “recover” them as a matter of national importance.

“There is no other path forward,” he said.

Milei, a right-wing libertarian who has applied shock therapy to Argentina’s economy since taking office in late 2023, has come under increasing pressure from the opposition, which has accused him of neglecting Argentina’s sovereignty claim. He has grown more vocal on the Malvinas as plans for large-scale oil production around the islands raise the economic stakes of the dispute.

He said he would sign decrees to introduce sanctions against any companies working on oil production around the islands, declaring that the Sea Lion oil field, a joint U.K.-Israel operation, is a “clear and present danger” to the country’s claims.

Production at the field about 220 kilometers (140 miles) north of the islands is expected to begin in 2028. Argentina considers the project an illegal exploitation of resources in waters it claims as its own.

“Argentina will not stand idly by,” Milei said. “Any further advance on the Malvinas Islands will be considered a violation of our national security.”

Milei’s address to the nation came amid increasing signs that the U.S. was preparing to change its long-held position on the future of the Malvinas.

For decades, successive U.S. administrations have remained neutral on the competing claims while recognizing Britain’s de facto administration of the islands. Any departure from that position would be a major diplomatic affront and inflame already high trans-Atlantic tensions .

On Thursday, in an interview with GB News, U.S. President Donald Trump suggested he would not back the U.K. in a fight over the Malvinas and pointed to its lack of support for his war in Iran at its launch on Feb. 28.

“The United States is considering this change in position because it knows that Argentina has a reliable partner, aligned with Western values, in a strategically important position that can be a valuable ally in the decades to come,” said Milei, arguably Trump’s closest ally in South America .

Residents of the Malvinas have indicated they prefer to remain a part of the U.K., and British Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband said the country will “resolutely uphold” their right to decide their future.

“The U.K.’s position on the Malvinas is unwavering,” he said on X. “The Islands are British and will remain so because that is the overwhelming position of the Islanders.”

In a 2013 referendum, the islanders voted overwhelmingly to remain a British overseas territory, with 99.8% voting in favor and just three votes against.

Milei dismissed that viewpoint, saying the inhabitants of the islands do “not have a legitimate right to self-determination.”

The worst-case scenario is that the dispute will once again lead to war.

In 1982, Argentina’s then-military dictatorship invaded the Malvinas. The U.K., led then by Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, sent a task force all the way down the Atlantic and retook the islands after 73 days of Argentine control. The war killed 649 Argentine and 255 British troops.

The humiliation of that ill-fated invasion soon led to the downfall of the junta, which had invaded in a desperate bid for popularity.

The backdrop now is very different. In the early 1980s, the Malvinas had a minimal British military presence. Now, there is a proper deterrent — more than a thousand troops, state-of-the-art jets and Royal Navy patrols nearby.

The future status of the islands has hobbled relations between the two countries, even though they share deep cultural and economic ties.

Though Argentina was never a British colony, British influence and money played a crucial role in the growth of the Argentine state in the decades after its establishment in 1816.

Most visibly, British influence is evident in the sporting arena, notably soccer, which was brought over by British immigrants.

But the Malvinas have undermined what should be a close relationship based on common interests. In the recent World Cup, Argentina beat archrival England 2-1 in the semifinals. Some of the Argentine players unfurled a banner after their win proclaiming the disputed Malvinas as their own: “Las Malvinas son argentinas.”